I have a background in ecological psychology and have been conducting a variety of research at UConn’s renowned Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action. I also have a passion for hoops and love nothing more than seeing the game played at a high level. As I gained more experience with the approach, I noticed that the way that I watched the game and even listened to how it was discussed began to change.
Now, a Steph Curry workout feels like watching Nikola Tesla in the laboratory, both seeing the world and dazzling the rest of us in ways that few can. I even have the urge to pull over anytime that I pass by a court and see a player dribbling through cones to ask them if they have 15 minutes to chat! This sounds like zealot-talk, but I am just doing what most of us do when we feel like we have found a more useful way to do things – they want to share it!
When it gets down to it, that is all I really want to do in this space. I know that one of the best ways to understand something is to see examples of it in practice. Alex already does a wonderful job of doing that with everything that Transforming Basketball shares.. Thus, I felt a good path to take for my first content for Transforming Basketball would be a series highlighting examples of players talking about the game ecologically.
Let me start by asking this – how many times have you heard a player mention how playing against chairs elevated their game? In this scene from Hoosiers, the following exchange occurs:
Coach Norman Dale: “Let’s move. Come on, let’s move.”
Player: “But when do we scrimmage?”
Coach: “We don’t scrimmage. No shooting either.”
Player: “That ain’t no fun!
Coach: “My practices aren’t designed for your enjoyment.”
If I could sum up the traditional approach in one example, it would be that drill and exchange. To return to my question about players lauding chair drills… you would be hard pressed to find good examples, if any at all. I make this point to bring your attention to how the players themselves talk about perceiving and acting in the game. For my first example, I will share a few clips from Jalen Williams (“JDub”) of the Oklahoma City Thunder talking about the game. The videos will be from two primary sources:
“We have a group of guys that like playing with each other. Tonight, and just throughout the whole season, I think we’ve done a good job of covering for each other and talking.” – (Nick Gallo on Twitter)
What he is describing is reciprocal compensation, which is a hallmark of interpersonal synergies (Araújo & Davids, 2016) in the eco approach. Briefly, an interpersonal synergy is a dynamic system consisting of more than one person coupled together by information where the individual actions and interactions self-organize, which leads to stable patterns of communication and cooperation (Dale et. al, 2013). Two characteristics of an interpersonal synergy are dimensional compression (e.g., instead of five players, there is one lineup) and reciprocal compensation (e.g., my teammate can’t hit a shot tonight, so I need to step up). Jalen did not have to break things down in all of those words to get the point across, but the principles are there and underlying successful performance.
The drill and the quote at the beginning of this article exemplified the traditional approach to skill development in basketball. However, Coach Dale redeems himself by stating the goal for his team that the quote from Jalen and the final clip should support:
Coach Dale: “Five players on the floor functioning as one single unit: team, team, team – no one more important than the other.”
Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2016). Team synergies in sport: theory and measures. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1449.Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N. D., & Richardson, D. C. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 59, pp. 43-95). Academic Press.
Learn more from Gray Thomas in his guest episode on the Transforming Basketball Podcast…
browse by
browse by
browse by
browse by