Walk into most basketball gyms and practice looks a lot like it did decades ago. Medicine, technology and engineering change their methods as the research moves on. Coaching mostly hasn't.
So it's worth asking where our habits come from, and whether the research on how players learn backs them up.
Path dependency: we coach how we were coached
In a lot of professions, experience gets tested against research. Basketball leans on how it has always been done.
This creates a phenomenon known as path dependency: even when superior, evidence-based methods are readily accessible, practitioners continue to rely on outdated approaches.
- The Problem: We run the same 3-man weaves, shell drills, and 1-on-0 block-practice exercises because that is how we were coached.
- The Theory: These methods come from information processing theory, which treats the brain like a computer that stores and retrieves movements. That is where "muscle memory" comes from, a term we avoid.
Two games that keep perception and action together
2-on-1 Float Dribble - Advantage start
The offensive player will pick a side to go around the cone. Live 2-on-1 from here. If the pass cannot be made to the cutter. They can sprint out to the 3-point line.
Warm-up - Pass Tag with Obstacles
Players have to pass the ball around and tag the escaping player with the basketball. Passers cannot dribble or run with the ball.
In both games, players have to read another player before they act.
Our skill acquisition workshop goes further into why we don't use the term "muscle memory."
Where traditional practice came from
To fully understand why basketball practices look the way they do, we have to look back to the industrial revolution. The traditional coaching model is heavily influenced by "Taylorism", an industrial workplace philosophy focused on strict work regimes, rigid role specification, and the micromanagement of workers through anatomical decomposition.
This industrial approach induced a "body as a machine" philosophy. Coaches break the game down into isolated, dead technical components, demanding that players replicate "fundamental" movements exactly as instructed.
That might work on an assembly line. On a basketball court, every possession throws up a new problem, and players have to solve it themselves.
Free resource
21 SSGs for your next practice.
A free PDF of small-sided games you can run right away. A practical first taste of the approach.
Organizational silos
Professional teams now have analytics, force plates and biomechanics. New technology on top of an old way of coaching doesn't change much on its own, though.
Without a unifying theoretical framework to connect these departments, organizations fall victim to highly siloed operations:
- Front Offices: Focused on data without context.
- Strength Coaches: Training linear, robotic movements in the weight room.
- Skill Trainers: Working in de-contextualized environments (1-on-0).
When each department measures its own piece, nobody is looking at the whole player. If the weight room doesn't talk to the court, the player gets two different programs.
One player, one framework
Survivorship bias
When traditionalists are challenged, they frequently point to the greatest players in the game as proof that rote repetition works. They ask, "If form shooting and block practice are so bad, how do you explain great NBA shooters?"
This is a classic example of survivorship bias. We direct our attention toward the individuals who survived a flawed system, while remaining blind to the failures and dropouts caused by those exact same methods.
NBA players are incredible survivors; they made it to the highest level despite the rigid environments they were placed in, not necessarily because of them. We will never know how many potential global superstars were lost because their natural self-organization and problem-solving abilities were stifled by "drills."
https://transformingbball.com/understanding-survivorship-bias/
Ecological dynamics
Ecological dynamics treats players as complex, adaptive systems. Skill is a relationship between the player and a changing environment, so practice has to keep that environment in.
Three types of constraints you can change
- Manipulate Task Constraints: Change rules or point systems to invite new solutions.
- Environmental Constraints: Adjust court space or sound to challenge perception.
- Individual Constraints: Account for a player’s unique limb length, fatigue, or mindset.
For games you can run at your next practice, start with our free Small-Sided Games Library.
Where to start
Pick one drill you run because you were coached that way. Ask what problem it gives your players, and whether a small-sided game with a defender would give them a better one.
Keep learning
- Join the Community: Access hundreds of SSG diagrams and clinics at TransformingBball.com
- The Deep Dive: Check out the Transforming Basketball book for the full evidence-based framework on player development.
Keep developing your coaching.
Connect these ideas with the Success Pathway, activity video library, coaching community and monthly live sessions.
Explore the membership